Department of Environmental Quality HomeSearchFeedbackContact UsAccess Idaho
skip nav
About Us
Public Info & Input
Air
Water
Waste
INL Oversight
Maps & Data
Rules & Regs

Return to

List of Subbasin Assessments, TMDLs, and Implementation Plans in Idaho

See Also

Overview of the TMDL Process


Portneuf River Subbasin TMDL Contact

Lynn Van Every
DEQ Pocatello

Regional Office

444 Hospital Way #300

Pocatello, ID  83201

ph: (208) 236-6160

fx: (208) 236-6168

lynn.vanevery@deq.idaho.gov


Surface Water: Portneuf River
Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Loads

> Link to document

> Link to addendum (02/01)

> Link to implementation plan
> Link to draft revision and addendum (11/09)

 The Subbasin at a Glance
Hydrologic Unit Code 17040208
Size 1,360 square miles
Number of §303(d) Listed Segments 30
Beneficial Uses Affected Cold water biota, salmonid spawning, primary and secondary contact recreation
Pollutants of Concern Sediment, nutrients, bacteria, flow alteration, oil and grease, dissolved oxygen
Major Land Uses Agriculture, rangeland, urban
Date Approved by U.S. EPA April 2001
 
 Background

The federal Clean Water Act requires that states and tribes restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters. States and tribes must adopt water quality standards necessary to protect fish, shellfish, and wildlife while providing for recreation in and on the waters whenever possible.

Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act establishes requirements for states and tribes to identify and prioritize water bodies that are water quality limited (i.e., water bodies that do not meet water quality standards). States and tribes must periodically publish a priority list of impaired waters, currently every two years. For waters identified on this list, states and tribes must develop water quality improvement plans known as total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) that establish allowable pollutant loads set at levels to achieve water quality standards.

 
 Overview

The Portneuf River Subbasin has numerous documented water quality problems that affect beneficial uses. Twenty-seven stream segments in the subbasin were listed on the 1994/1996 §303(d) list, including the mainstem Portneuf River, 16 tributaries, and Hawkins Reservoir. All segments include sediment as a pollutant of concern and roughly half are listed for nutrients. The mainstem Portneuf River is also listed for bacteria, flow alteration, and oil and grease. Hawkins Reservoir is listed for dissolved oxygen. Evidence indicates that other pollutants, such as temperature, metals, and PCBs, may also be impairing the waters in the Portneuf River Subbasin.

Information collected through the Beneficial Use Reconnaissance Program indicates that several streams on the §303(d) list (Gibson Jack, Mink, Walker, Bell Marsh, Goodenough, upper Garden, Dempsey, Pebble, and Toponce Creeks) are supporting their beneficial uses; it is recommended that these streams be removed from the §303(d) list.

 
 Pollutants for Which TMDLs Were Developed
TMDLs were prepared for fecal coliform, oil and grease, suspended sediment, total inorganic nitrogen, and total phosphorus from nonpoint and point sources.
 
 Original Subbasin Assessment and TMDLs

Note: Some PDF files do not open properly due to computer setting conflicts. If you have difficulty opening this or any PDF file, try changing the default settings in Adobe Acrobat Reader.  See DEQ's About PDF Files (specifically Problem 1, suggestions D, E, and F) for guidance.

View entire document (including appendices) (pdf 6.1 mb, 249 pages)
Because of the large size of this pdf document, we have also divided it into sections for quicker download.
Prefatory Material: Cover, Table of Contents, List of Figures, List of Tables 311 kb, 10 pages
Chapter 1: Executive Summary 179 kb, 4 pages
Chapter 2:

Portneuf River Subbasin Description (Entire)

Portneuf River Subbasin Description

(without figures)

2.2 mb, 77 pages

 

1.7 mb, 64 pages

Chapter 3: Portneuf River Loading Analysis 1.5 mb, 55 pages
Supporting Documentation:

Acronyms and an Abbreviated Glossary, Literature Cited

541 kb, 19 pages
Appendices: Appendices A through G 1.5 mb, 85 pages
 
 Addendum (February 2001)
View February 2001 Addendum (pdf 1.8 mb, 54 pages): Chapter 4 (Management Actions and Implementation) and Response to EPA Review Comments.
 
 Implementation Plan
View entire document (pdf 8.6 mb, 245 pages)
Due to the large size of this pdf document, we have divided it into sections for quicker downloading as follows:

Section 1: Introduction

Section 2: City of Pocatello

Section 3: City of Inkom

Section 4: City of Lava Hot Springs

Section 5: FMC Idaho, LLC

1.5 mb, 24 pages
Section 6: Agriculture - Idaho Soil Conservation Commission 1.7 mb, 160 pages
Section 7: Caribou/Targhee National Forest 2.4 mb, 23 pages
Section 8: J.R. Simplot Company 2.4 mb, 33 pages

Section 9: Roads - Idaho Transportation Department

Section 10: Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)/

Southeastern District Health Department (DH)

695 kb, 9 pages
 
 Draft Revision and Addendum (November 2009)

DEQ is currently seeking public comment on a revised assessment of water quality in the Portneuf River Subbasin and TMDLs to ensure water quality standards are met.
The document addresses pollution in water bodies that are on Idaho’s 2008 list of impaired waters and carryovers from previous lists, including the entire Portneuf River and its major tributaries.

In the Portneuf River (Marsh Creek to the Fort Hall Reservation Boundary), TMDLs are proposed to address excess sediment, E-coli, total phosphorus, and oil and grease.


In Hawkins Reservoir, TMDLs are proposed for dissolved oxygen, total phosphorus, and nutrients.


In addition, TMDLs are proposed to address the following pollutants in these assessment units:

  • Sediment: Beaverdam Creek, Marsh Creek (upper), Kinney Creek (headwaters to Mink Creek), and South Fork Pocatello Creek (headwaters to Pocatello Creek.
  • E. coli: Cherry Creek (three assessment units), Dempsey Creek (lower), Garden Creek (lower), Indian Creek, Marsh Creek (lower middle and upper), and Mink Creek (lower).
  • Nutrients: Marsh Creek (upper).


The document also proposes delisting some water bodies in the subbasin for certain pollutants that no longer pose a threat to water quality. Two segments of Cherry and North Fork Pocatello Creeks, Yago Creek, and Rapid Creek (lower) are proposed to be delisted for sediment. A segment of Cherry Creek would also be delisted for nutrients.

› View draft October 2009 Revision and Addendum (pdf 3.1 mb, 364 pages).

Submit written comments by 5 p.m. MST, Friday, December 4, 2009.

 



  Home | Search | Contact Us |Feedback | About PDF Files | Acronyms | Glossary | State of Idaho | Privacy Notice  
  Copyright © 2000-2009, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality. All rights reserved.