








Return to
List
of Subbasin Assessments, TMDLs, and Implementation Plans in Idaho
See Also
Overview
of the TMDL Process
Beaver-Camas Creek Subbasin
TMDL Contact
Troy Saffle
DEQ Idaho Falls
Regional Office
900 N. Skyline,
Suite B
Idaho Falls, ID 83402
ph: (208) 528-2650
fx: (208) 528-2695
troy.saffle@deq.idaho.gov
|
 |
Surface Water: Beaver-Camas Subbasin
Assessment and Total Maximum
Daily Loads
| > Link
to document
|
| The Subbasin at a Glance |
| Hydrologic
Unit Code |
17040214 |
| Size |
643,083 acres (1,005 square miles) |
§303(d) Listed Stream
Segments |
Camas Creek (2 segments), Beaver Creek (2
segments), Cow Creek |
| Beneficial
Uses Affected |
Cold water, salmonid
spawning, primary/secondary contact recreation, domestic water
supply |
| Pollutants
of Concern |
Nutrients, sediment, temperature, flow alteration,
habitat alteration |
| Major Land Uses
|
Range, irrigated agriculture, forestry |
| Date
Approved by U.S. EPA |
August 2005 |
|
| |
| Background |
The
federal Clean Water Act requires that states and tribes restore
and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of
the nation's waters. States and tribes must adopt water quality
standards necessary to protect fish, shellfish, and wildlife while
providing for recreation in and on the waters whenever possible.
Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act establishes requirements
for states and tribes to identify and prioritize water bodies that
are water quality limited (i.e., water bodies that do not meet water
quality standards). States and tribes must periodically publish a
priority list of impaired waters, currently every two years. For waters
identified on this list, states and tribes must develop water quality
improvement plans known as total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) that
establish allowable pollutant loads set at levels to achieve water
quality standards.
|
| |
| Overview |
The
Beaver-Camas Subbasin of southeast Idaho is a watershed of the Upper
Snake River Basin. The watershed is the easternmost in a series
of five "sinks drainages." The subbasin is dominated by
both natural and human-caused flow alterations.
Data
have been collected and analyzed to evaluate the scope of the water
quality limiting issues on §303(d) listed and non-listed streams.
Seven temperature TMDLs and one sediment TMDL have been developed
in response to the data. Some TMDLs have been established for non-listed
streams since water quality data show that there are exceedances
of Idaho's water quality standards.
Stream
bank erosion, reduced riparian vegetation, and low flow conditions
are the causes of increased water temperatures in the subbasin.
Riparian grazing is the principal source of temperature and sediment
loading to the watershed. Elevated temperatures from reduced riparian
vegetation and accelerated stream bank erosion have been exacerbated
by an ongoing drought.
There
are two §303(d) listed segments on Beaver Creek. Temperatures
in the upper segment of the creek exceed the state standard and
a TMDL was developed. Perennial flows are seldom seen in the lower
segment; therefore, it is proposed to be de-listed for all currently
listed pollutants and re-listed only as flow altered.
Camas
Creek is §303(d) listed from its headwaters to its mouth (as
two segments). Riparian grazing has contributed to bank erosion
and elevated stream temperatures. Sediment and temperature TMDLs
have been calculated to address the pollutants of concern in the
upper segment. The lower segment of Camas Creek is intermittent
and flow altered for irrigation; therefore, it is recommended this
segment be listed only as flow altered. No TMDLs were developed
for the lower segment.
Cow
Creek is §303(d) listed, but is an ephemeral stream and therefore
should be de-listed; ephemeral streams are not expected to support
the same biological communities as perennial waters.
Dairy,
East Fork Camas, Modoc, Threemile, and West Fork Camas Creeks are
not §303(d) listed. However, stream temperature data show that
there were major exceedances in Idaho's numeric temperature criteria
in these creeks. Temperature TMDLs were established for all five
streams.
TMDLs
were not developed for streams listed as flow or habitat altered.
The EPA does not believe that flow or habitat alteration are pollutants
as defined by the Clean Water Act. Since TMDLs are not required
for water bodies impaired by pollution but not pollutants, TMDLs
were not developed for flow or habitat altered streams.
|
| |
| Streams and Pollutants for Which TMDLs Were
Developed |
| Beaver Creek |
Temperature |
| Camas Creek |
Sediment, temperature |
| Dairy Creek |
Temperature |
| East Camas Creek |
Temperature |
| Modoc Creek |
Temperature |
| Threemile Creek |
Temperature |
| West Camas Creek |
Temperature |
|
| |
| Subbasin Assessment and TMDLs |
|
|
| View
entire document (pdf 7.6
mb, 252 pages) |
Because
of the large size of this pdf document, we have also divided
it into sections for quicker download. |
|
| Prefatory Material: |
Cover;
Acknowledgments; Table of Contents (including Lists of
Tables, Figures, and Appendices); Abbreviations, Acronyms,
and Symbols; Executive Summary |
240 kb, 28 pages |
| Chapter 1: |
Subbasin
Assessment - Watershed Characterization (including maps)
Subbasin
Assessment - Watershed Characterization (text only) |
3.1
mb, 52 pages
1.5 mb, 33
pages |
| Chapter 2: |
Subbasin
Assessment - Water Quality Concerns and Status (including
maps)
Subbasin
Assessment - Water Quality Concerns and Status (text
only) |
3.0
mb, 45 pages
420 kb, 37
pages |
| Chapter 3: |
Subbasin
Assessment - Pollutant Source Inventory |
18 kb, 2 pages |
| Chapter 4: |
Subbasin
Assessment - Summary of Past and Present Pollution Control
Efforts |
14 kb, 2 pages |
| Chapter 5: |
Total
Maximum Daily Loads |
963 kb, 28 pages |
| Supporting Documentation: |
References,
Glossary |
76 kb, 24 pages |
| Appendices: |
Appendices
A - L |
356 kb, 71 pages |
|
|
| |
|
 |