








See Also
Guidance
Documents for Engineers and Developers
Plans
and Spec Review Checklists for Engineers and Developers
Need more info?
Contact Your
Nearest
DEQ Regional Office
|
 |
Wastewater Management:
Land Development Approaches
|
|
|
|
| Wastewater treatment is a key component
of any land development project. To assist those involved in planning
or approving land development projects
in Idaho, DEQ has developed the following general wastewater guidance.
It provides descriptions of wastewater treatment systems, links to
guidance documents and rules, and necessary approvals. For more detailed
information, consult a design engineer or contact your nearest DEQ
Regional Office.
|
|
|
| On-Site (Septic) Systems |
Individual
Septic Tank and Drainfield
|
These
are standard systems and usually consist of a 1000-gallon concrete
septic tank and a drainfield or "leach" field. Septic
tank effluent typically has nitrate levels at a range of around
45 mg/L. Nutrient-pathogen (NP) studies may be required for new
subdivisions. These systems require Health Department approval and
permitting, with possible DEQ review for NP study.
|
| For
more information:
|
| |
| Enhanced Individual
Septic Tank and Drainfield |
These
systems typically employ a type of filtration or other extended
treatment after the septic tank to reduce nutrients or solids entering
the drainfield and, therefore, the groundwater. (See TGM link above.)
These systems require Health Department approval and permitting,
with possible DEQ review for NP study. |
| |
| Central Systems
or Large Soil Absorption Systems |
Central
systems are defined as any system that receives blackwaste or wastewater
from more than two dwelling units or more than two buildings under
separate ownership or receives blackwaste or wastewater in volumes
exceeding 2,500 gpd. Large Soil Absorption Systems (LSAS) are subsurface
sewage disposal systems designed to receive
2,500 gpd or more.
Both Health
Districts and DEQ review central systems and LSASs. The responsibilities
of each agency are outlined in the February
2000 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Public Health
Districts and DEQ. An engineering report (including design calculations)
is required for all central systems and LSASs. An NP study is required
for all LSASs. DEQ conducts the NP study review. |
For more information:
|
| |
| Decentralized Systems |
| On-site
systems also can be defined as "decentralized systems." For this
discussion, decentralized systems involve those that do not discharge
to an existing municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) or publicly
owned treatment works (POTW). Those are usually defined as centralized
systems and are discussed below. |
| |
| Wastewater
Collection System |
| Wastewater
collection systems typically include gravity, vacuum or pressure-piped
systems from homes in the subdivision that discharge to a central
wastewater treatment facility. Gravity collection is preferred from
an operation and maintenance position, but is sometimes expensive
to build in high groundwater or rock. Vacuum collection is preferred
for these situations if the terrain is relatively flat and the number
of homes is sufficient to make it cost effective. Vacuum collection
is also preferred over pressure collection in cold weather situations.
Otherwise, pressure collection may be selected when there are difficulties
with gravity or vacuum collection systems. When proposed for use,
all of these systems must meet various requirements including review
by DEQ. |
| |
| Wastewater
Treatment System |
| Many
types of wastewater treatment systems are available for decentralized
developments. These include lagoon systems, conventional activated
sludge systems, oxidation ditches, sequencing batch reactors, micro-filtration
using membrane bioreactors, and many others. Recent technology has
favored technologies that produce higher quality effluent, utilize
a smaller footprint, minimize odors, and provide for limited impact
on groundwater when land applied.
When proposed
for use, all of these systems must meet various requirements including
review by DEQ. Each proposed system must have a proven track record,
as determined by DEQ based on independent monitoring and testing
of previous pilot or full-scale plants. Process approval is required
prior to site-specific project approval. Also , each system approved
for use must be operated by a licensed wastewater operator. DEQ
approves entities that contract with one or more facilities to provide
needed operation, maintenance, monitoring, testing, etc. |
|
For more information:
|
| |
| Treated Wastewater
Effluent "Disposal" |
| The
three main methods of treated wastewater effluent "disposal" are
discharge to surface water, subsurface discharge, and land application
for beneficial use.
Discharge
to surface water requires
an NPDES permit from the U.S. EPA. It can be difficult, although
not impossible, for small dischargers to obtain an NPDES permit.
Writing an NPDES permit is a time-consuming task, and because EPA's
budget and resources are limited, priority is given to re-permitting
larger existing facilities. Also, Idaho limits contaminant loads
that particular reaches of streams can receive through the state's
water quality improvement plans known as Total Maximum Daily Loads
(TMDLs).
Subsurface
discharge of effluent: See information on Central
Systems and Large Soil Absorption Systems above.
Land
application for beneficial use in Idaho is managed
by the wastewater land application permit program administered by
DEQ. Various requirements and treatment limits for effluent
dictate the beneficial use of the effluent. Beneficial uses include
growing crops such as hay or grain, growing trees, and watering
golf courses, parks and other "common" areas of developments. Some
states have similar rules that allow less restricted uses for very
highly treated effluent such as individual lawn watering and ground
water recharge. Idaho is considering adding these uses and associated
additional limits and requirements. |
| |
| Centralized Systems |
| Large-scale
municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) or publicly owned
treatment plants (POTWs) are generally defined as centralized systems.
They serve larger populations of established cities and sometimes
provide treatment and disposal services for neighboring sewer districts.
They can have similar treatment processes and equipment as decentralized
systems, but on a larger scale. Advantages of centralized systems
over various decentralized systems include economies of scale, more
controlled operations, one management and staff force instead of
several, and one discharge to monitor instead of several.
Most of
the POTWs in the U.S. were built in the 1970s and 1980s with EPA
construction grants. In those years, EPA and others focused primarily
on centralized systems. This belief is generally held today as well,
although there are good reasons for use of decentralized systems
and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. |
|
 |